Seattle Personal Injury Attorney Chris Thayer
Seattle Personal Injury Attorney Chris Thayer
Handling Personal Injury Claims in the Seattle Area and Throughout Washington Since 1995

My name is Chris Thayer and I am a personal injury attorney practicing in downtown Seattle. I handle personal injury, medical malpractice and wrongful death claims throughout the greater Seattle area, including Issaquah, Mercer Island and Kirkland.

I am here to help you.

Call for a free consultation (206) 340-2008

The Seattle Personal Injury Blog

Four of the Biggest Complaints Injury Victims Have When Dealing With Lawyers

Posted Friday, December 4, 2020 by Chris Thayer

For those of us who routinely deal with insurance companies, we are quite accustomed to handling long wait times, adjusters who ignore our communications, and courts that often move a little slower than we would like. But this is largely because Seattle personal injury lawyers deal with this type of thing every single day, whereas the typical injury victim will likely only suffer one catastrophic event in a lifetime. That said, there are a few big complaints that tend to be common when people are dealing with attorneys, and this is why it is so important to work with a lawyer you trust and with whom you enjoy working.

*My Lawyer Never Lets me Know What is Going on*While most attorneys do a good job of trying to keep their clients informed, personal injury cases present a unique set of challenges, and not every attorney is well-equipped to deal with those challenges. For instance, personal injury cases can last for years, regardless of the skill or effort of the attorney. This may be due to a backlog of cases on the court’s calendar, or it may be due to a client needing to continue seeking advanced medical care. Finally, even after a case settles or reaches a verdict, there can be a long lag time waiting for payment. Still, a client should be able to expect that they can call and get updates and that their attorneys will contact them regularly to discuss the case and give updates, even if there really is not much to report.

*My Attorney is Trying to Force Me to Settle*This one is a touchy subject because on one hand, your attorney should never be forcing you to take a settlement that you do not want. On the other hand, there are indeed times when an attorney will strongly advise a client not to go to trial. Striking the balance can be tough.

One thing to consider is that an experienced personal injury lawyer is one who has repeatedly handled cases against insurance companies. After going to trial numerous times, a lawyer develops a certain sense for what a jury may do with certain information. Often, things that seem obvious and clear may not even be admissible in a court of law. It is important to agree on the goals of litigation and reach some consensus on expectations, as well.

*My Lawyer Did Not Explain the Fees*Personal injury cases are generally handled through a contingent fee agreement. A contingent fee is one that is set based on a percentage of the funds recovered. In general, these fees are only paid if the case is successful in recovering compensation. This should be a fairly straightforward arrangement and an easy enough one to explain. Sadly, there are attorneys who charge unreasonable fees. The Washington State Rules of Professional Conduct outline what are considered to be reasonable fees and some of the factors to consider when assessing fees.

*My Case is Taking Too Long*Unfortunately, this complaint is closely related to the first. When people are not kept in the loop, time can pass slowly and make them feel ignored. This should never happen. The fact is, most injury claims do take quite a while to resolve. In some situations, the client must receive lengthy and ongoing treatment. In other cases, the court may have reasons for delaying things. Whatever the case, it is important to understand what to expect from the start.

*Get Compassionate and Skilled Help Now*If you are suffering from injuries and need skilled legal representation, do not take your chances with untested and unproven lawyers. Call Pivotal Law Group, and see the difference. We work hard to make sure each and every client is kept informed from start to finish. Give us a call to get started today. It all begins with your own personalized free consultation.

List of the Most Common Bad Drug Lawsuits

Posted Friday, November 27, 2020 by Chris Thayer

You have probably heard advertisements mentioning bad drugs or dangerous drugs, but do you really know what these ads are talking about? A lot of people think that just because someone had an adverse effect from a prescription medication, that will automatically mean they have a right to compensation. While true that bad side effects are often part of why a drug ends up in litigation, the truth is there is far more to proving a dangerous drug case. Here is a brief list of some of the most common and notable bad drug cases out there, and the reasons why those cases were filed. If you or a loved one has suffered serious consequences or a death due to one of these drugs, you should take action now to protect your rights.

  • Actos. Used to treat Type II Diabetes, it also is alleged to cause bladder cancer. The company - Takeda Pharmaceuticals - agreed to pay out $2.5 billion in a settlement in 2015, despite claiming no fault. This enormous settlement may not be the end, as new information is allegedly coming forward regarding additional known complications of the drug that were not communicated to the public and patients.
  • Depakote. Used to treat seizures, this medication has the unfortunate distinction of causing birth defects in babies when the mothers were on the medication. The allegation includes claims that the manufacturer knew about the problem and failed to warn the public and potential patients.
  • Benicar. A basic blood pressure medication, but many patients claim it led to heart conditions, but more commonly sprue-like enteropathy. This is a condition that leads to gastrointestinal problems like weight loss, diarrhea, and severe abdominal pain. Again, the allegation is that the company failed to warn consumers.

*Benefits of Talking to an Experienced Washington Injury Lawyer*Time is of the essence when it comes to medication cases. Pharmaceutical companies spend millions on highly skilled and heavily resourced legal teams, all in an effort to avoid responsibility for the medications that they create - even when they knowingly introduce dangerous medications into the market and conceal the potential effects. Often, there are strict deadlines that apply to filing suit for compensation. Just as importantly, however, some settlements have already occurred, leaving large sums of money in managed third-party settlement trusts. These funds can only be accessed if your injury occurred within a certain timeframe and you take actions in time. So there really is no time to waste. Delaying could cost you your entire right to be compensated. In some cases, this can mean walking away from substantial compensation that could help pay for surgeries and future medical care that is necessary due to the pharmaceutical company’s neglect.

At Pivotal Law Group, we are poised and ready to take on Big Pharma. If you are experiencing painful symptoms from a medication and believe you may have a claim for injuries, give us a call or find us online today.

Mediation, Arbitration, and Alternative Dispute Resolution

Posted Friday, November 20, 2020 by Chris Thayer

In Washington, like many states, the vast majority of all injury claims are resolved through non-court remedies nowadays. These include negotiations with insurance adjusters, negotiations with defense lawyers, mediations, arbitrations, and privately held conferences. Even those cases that are filed as lawsuits in court often resolve through settlement of some sort. So, why is it important to still work with experienced trial lawyers, and how do these types of non-litigation methods of settlement actually work in Washington?

*Alternative Dispute Resolution*The term for all these various forms of out-of-court settlement negotiations is alternative dispute resolution (or “ADR”). ADR consists of any form of resolution method that is kept private and does not require a trial in court. Under federal law, these types of settlement methods are favored in the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), under Title 9 of the U.S. Code. That federal statute states unequivocally that:

“an agreement in writing to submit to arbitration an existing controversy arising out of such a contract, transaction, or refusal, shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract.” (See Sect. 2 of FAA).

Therefore, in most instances, contracts and agreements to arbitrate will be upheld, except where there is a good legal reason not to. For these reasons, many courts are reluctant to permit cases to be filed in court where the parties previously agreed to arbitrate. So, what is arbitration exactly?

*Understanding the Terminology: Arbitration vs. Mediation*Mediation is a voluntary process, typically, whereby a plaintiff and defendant sit down with their respective legal counsels and attempt to hash out differences and negotiate a fair and mutually agreeable settlement. Mediations are led by mediators, who are typically retired attorneys or judges with many years of experience resolving claims this way. Mediations are also sometimes mandatory in other proceedings, such as divorce court. In the context of personal injury claims, they are used as a way to assist the parties in reaching an agreement prior to a trial.

Arbitration, however, is usually a mandatory process required by a court. At one time, all cases with a claimed value under $15,000 had to proceed to arbitration. This is a process where an arbitrator (certified by the state to perform arbitrations) hears the case outside of court and renders an award, much like a verdict. However, the limit was once raised to $50,000 and has been recently raised again to $100,000. This means any case with a claimed value of less than that must proceed to arbitration first.

*What Happens if You are Unhappy with an Arbitration Award?*Those who are displeased with the arbitration award may request a trial de novo, meaning “new trial.” However, if the party who demands trial is not successful in improving the outcome for their side, then they are assessed costs and attorney’s fees. This can be a strong reason to accept the award. But it also means that a rogue arbitration award that is not connected to reality can and should be challenged by going to trial.

With all of this in mind, it should come as no surprise that experienced litigators fair better in arbitrations and mediations. This is largely because of two things. First, the defense knows they are likely to improve the award at trial, so they are more likely to pay better settlements and possibly not even require the case to reach arbitration or trial. Second, experience helps to better inform settlement decisions. So, if you or a loved one are suffering injuries from an accident in Washington, give Pivotal Law Group a call today. Let us discuss your case free of charge and provide you and your family with peace of mind knowing you are represented by experienced trial lawyers who can go the distance.

Is Washington State a “No-Fault” Injury State?

Posted Friday, November 13, 2020 by Chris Thayer

Alternative TextNo. Washington State does not apply a “no-fault” approach to insurance claims. However, there are some situations in which similar results may apply. Also, there are times when Washington State drivers get into accidents with drivers from so-called no-fault states. Finally, there are situations in which injured motorists may get into disputes with their own insurance carriers over things like uninsured motorist policies and medical payments insurance. For these reasons, it is worth noting the differences between no-fault states and tort-based states, as well as the types of insurance available to drivers throughout Seattle and neighboring cities.

*What is No-Fault Insurance?*No fault insurance is essentially a type of insurance policy that pays a specific limit of coverage no matter who causes the accident. In certain states, like Michigan, New York, and Florida, injured motorists and their passengers must first file claims for injury coverage with their own insurance companies before they can make claims against the at-fault driver who caused the collision. There are some advantages to this approach, such as not needing to fight over fault and faster payment of medical expenses. However, it also tends to deny people the right to compensation and can make it more complicated to get paid for injuries. Washington does not follow this approach.

*What is a Tort-Based Insurance Model?*Washington follows the same approach as the majority of states, which is holding the at-fault driver responsible for all the injuries they cause. That person’s insurance carrier is primarily going to have to cover the injuries, unless it is insufficient to cover all the damages. In that case, we would turn to the injured person’s own insurance company for excess coverage.

*What Types of Insurance Can You Carry in Washington?*In Washington, there are four basic types of injury policies:

  • Liability. This coverage pays for the injuries you cause to other people.
  • Medical Payments (med pay). This is designed to pay for your medical bills and those of your passengers without any consideration for fault.
  • Uninsured Motorist. This insurance covers your injuries and your passengers’ injuries in the event the at-fault driver did not have insurance.
  • Underinsured Motorist. This coverage fills the gap between your limits and those of the person who caused the crash. If they had a low policy limit and it leaves you under-compensated, then this insurance makes up the difference.

Out-of-state drivers often carry different limits of coverage or may come from no-fault jurisdictions. In these limited situations, there is a need to review the insurance policies to determine what coverages will apply. This is where an experienced personal injury lawyer comes in handy.

*Steps to Take if Hurt in a Car Accident*If you are injured in a motor vehicle crash in Washington, first call the police and make a report. Next, get medical treatment immediately. Finally, call a lawyer as soon as you are able. The faster that an attorney gets involved, the sooner your rights can be protected. For help, check out Pivotal Law Group online, or just give us a ring to set up an initial case evaluation today.

What if I Die Before My Case Settles?

Posted Friday, November 6, 2020 by Chris Thayer

When people are seriously hurt in accidents, one of the common concerns is how much money they will receive. But for older victims or those with terminal illnesses, it is also common to fear what happens if they should pass away before the conclusion of their case. Fortunately, there is good news for Washington State residents who are hurt due to negligence. Washington law allows surviving family members to collect the money upon compensation. Experienced injury lawyers can help to preserve your claim even if you should pass away.

*Washington Survival Act* Under the Washington Revised Code, Section 4.20.046, actions that survive the death of a plaintiff then pass to the probate estate of that decedent. Not all claims pass to the estate, but injury claims generally do. For instance, here are just a few types of cases that can be brought by the surviving representative of the estate:

  • Car accident claims
  • Slip and fall claims
  • Nursing home abuse and neglect cases
  • Medical malpractice claims
  • Intentional torts (battery, etc.)

*Deadlines That Apply to Survival Claims* In most cases, you will have just three years from the date of injury, not death, in order to bring a lawsuit for your injury. So, if you are injured in a car accident but later die of unrelated causes, your estate will be bound to file a claim with the court within three years of your accident. One court case further explains how these statutes of limitations can be affected by death or disability. There are some unique situations that can change this. For instance:

  • If you die due to your injuries, your heirs may have a separate claim for wrongful death.
  • If you are mentally incompetent (dementia, coma, etc.), the statute of limitations may toll (be delayed) until after death.

Ultimately, there are many unique facts that can make a significant difference in how long you have to pursue your case. This is why it is so important to schedule a free consultation with a personal injury law firm with decades of experience helping injury victims in Washington State.

*How Wrongful Death Differs From Survival* A survival claim is an injury to the decedent that would have been compensable had he or she lived. If the decedent lived, then that person could have pursued compensation. Due to the death, those rights pass to the decedent’s estate, and any money collected passes by will or action of law.

On the contrary, wrongful death claims are the property of the heirs. The surviving spouse and children bring these claims for their own losses, emotional distress, loss of society and income. These claims do not pass through a will or probate estate. Instead, they are direct claims that can be compensated through negotiations or litigation.

At Pivotal Law Group, our attorneys frequently appear in state and federal courts throughout the state, working hard to protect the rights of injured citizens everywhere. For more information or to speak with an attorney free of charge, find us online or give us a call. There is no obligation and no risk for calling today.